Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 5/16/17 18:14, pg...@postgresql.org wrote: >> Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created.
> Was this change in naming pattern intentional? Yes, it was. Andrew Dunstan suggested during the two-part-version-number discussion that we should start including a "_" after REL in tag and branch names for v10 and later, so that those names would sort correctly compared to the tag/branch names for earlier branches (at least when using C locale). I believe his main concern was some logic in the buildfarm, but it seems like a good idea in general. When we get to v100, we'll need some other hack to make it work ... but I plan to be safely dead by then. BTW, I now remember having wondered if we should make any other changes in version-number formatting while we're at it, like maybe "10beta1" should be "10.beta1". It's a bit late to have remembered it for beta1, but is anyone hot to change anything else about these labels? regards, tom lane  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/57364c11.4040...@dunslane.net  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20780.1463176901%40sss.pgh.pa.us -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers