On 05/16/2017 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 5/16/17 18:14, pg...@postgresql.org wrote:
>>> Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created.
>> Was this change in naming pattern intentional?
> Yes, it was.  Andrew Dunstan suggested[1] during the
> two-part-version-number discussion that we should start including a "_"
> after REL in tag and branch names for v10 and later, so that those names
> would sort correctly compared to the tag/branch names for earlier branches
> (at least when using C locale).  I believe his main concern was some logic
> in the buildfarm, but it seems like a good idea in general.
> When we get to v100, we'll need some other hack to make it work ...
> but I plan to be safely dead by then.

Me too. Since posterity will be deprived of both of us let's note that
the same hack will work, we'll just need two underscores.



Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to