On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 1:46 AM, tushar <tushar.ah...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 12:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm ... I don't see a crash here, but I wonder whether you have parameters
>> set that would cause this query to be run as a parallel query?  Because
>> pg_rotate_logfile() is marked as parallel-safe in pg_proc, which seems
>> probably insane.
> Well, I am able to see a crash .  Enable "logging_collector=on" in
> postgresql.conf file / restart the server and fire below sql query - 5 or 6
> times

Just out of curiosity, what happens if you try it with the attached patch?

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment: no-sigmask.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to