On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Well, but then we should just remove minval/maxval if we can't rely on > it.
That seems like a drastic overreaction to me. > I wonder if that's not actually very little new code, and I think we > might end up regretting having yet another inconsistent set of semantics > in v10, which we'll then end up changing again in v11. I'm not exercised enough about it to spend time on it or to demand that Peter do so, but feel free to propose something. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers