On 5/31/17 21:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/31/17 02:17, Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd say we can fix this issue by just changing the query. Attached
>>> patch changes the query so that it can handle publication name
>>> correctly, the query gets complex, though.
>>>
>> In is_publishable_class function, there are four conditions to decide
>> whether this is a publishable class or not.
>>
>> 1. relkind == RELKIND_RELATION
>> 2. IsCatalogClass()
>> 3. relpersistence == 'p'
>> 4. relid >= FirstNormalObjectId /* Skip tables created during initdb */
>>
>> I think the modified query should have a check for the fourth condition as 
>> well.
> 
> The query should be fixed like in the attached patch.
> pg_get_publication_tables() ends up calling is_publishable_class()
> internally.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to