On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
<jeevan.la...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have addressed Ashutosh's and Amit's comments in the attached patch.
> Please let me know if I have missed anything and any further comments.
> PFA.
> Regards,
> Jeevan Ladhe

What is the reason the new patch does not mention of violating rows
when a new partition overlaps with default?
Is it because more than one row could be violating the condition?


Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to