Hello, On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.la...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have addressed Ashutosh's and Amit's comments in the attached patch. > > Please let me know if I have missed anything and any further comments. > > PFA. > > Regards, > Jeevan Ladhe >
What is the reason the new patch does not mention of violating rows when a new partition overlaps with default? Is it because more than one row could be violating the condition? -- Beena Emerson EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
