On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.la...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > >> >> What is the reason the new patch does not mention of violating rows >> when a new partition overlaps with default? >> Is it because more than one row could be violating the condition? > > > This is because, for reporting the violating error, I had to function > ExecBuildSlotValueDescription() public. Per Amit's comment I have > removed this change and let the overlapping error without row contains. > I think this is analogus to other functions that are throwing violation > error > but are not local to execMain.c. >
ok thanks. -- Beena Emerson EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
