On 06/06/2017 02:44 PM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
>> On 06/06/2017 11:57 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
>>>>> Unless Robert objects, I'll work with Mike to get a fix posted and
>>>>> committed in the next day or two.
>>>> That would be great.  Thanks.
>>> I have the updated patch with rowsecurity regression tests and rebased
>>> on master. I've run these and verified locally by feeding
>>> rowsecurity.sql to psql, but have yet to get the full regression suite
>>> passing -- it's failing on the constraints regtest and then gets stuck
>>> in recovery. Undoubtedly something to do with my
>>> configuration/environment over here. I'm working through those issues
>>> right now. In the meantime, if you want to see the regression tests as
>>> they stand, please see the attached patch.
>> The constraints test passes here, so presumably something you borked
>> locally. I only see a rowsecurity failure, which is not surprising since
>> your patch does not include the changes to expected output ;-)
>> Please resend with src/test/regress/expected/rowsecurity.out included.
> It was indeed an issue on my end. Attached are the rowsecurity
> regression tests and the expected out. Unsurprisingly, all tests pass,
> because I said so. :)
> Let me know if you want me to make any revisions.

Thanks Mike. I'll take a close look to verify output correctnes, but I
am concerned that the new tests are unnecessarily complex. Any other
opinions on that?


Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to