On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
> > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions)
> > in order to demonstrate policy sorting and order of RLS/partition
> > constraint checking. It should be much more straight-forward now, but
> > let me know if there are any further recommended changes.
> Thanks, will take a look towards the end of the day.

This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to