Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> It doesn't seem like a problem to me if somebody else wants to extend
> it to hostaddr, though. Whether that change belongs in v10 or v11 is
> debatable. I would object to adding this as an open item with me as
> the owner because doesn't seem to me to be a must-fix issue, but I
> don't mind someone else doing the work.
If you want to define multiple-hostaddrs as a future feature, that
seems fine, but I think Heikki is describing actual bugs. The minimum
that I think needs to be done for v10 is to make libpq reject a hostaddr
string with the wrong number of entries (either different from the
host list, or different from 1).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
