On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/05/20 9:01, Thomas Munro wrote: >> Sent too soon. Several variables should also be renamed to make clear >> they refer to the transition capture state in effect, instead of vague >> names like 'transitions'. Sorry for the version churn. > > Ah, I was kind of getting distracted by it earlier too; thanks. > > Anyway, the patch looks good to me.
[Adding Andrew Gierth] Here is a rebased version of the patch to fix transition tables with inheritance. Fixes a typo in an error message ("not support on partitions" -> "... supported ..."), and changes regression test triggers to be single-event (only one of INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE), because a later patch will not allow multi-event triggers with TTs. This is patch 1 of a stack of 3 patches addressing currently known problems with transition tables. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers