Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 08:10:13PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Sergey Burladyan <eshkin...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > > > > >> ! against the old primary and standby clusters. Verify that the > > >> ! <quote>Latest checkpoint location</> values match in all clusters. > > > > > > For "Log-Shipping only" standby server this cannot be satisfied, because > > > last WAL from master (with shutdown checkpoint) never archived. > > > > > > > Yeah, we have ensured that all the transactions before shutdown > > checkpoint got archived. It is done in commit > > 2e6107cb621d003dcab0df53ac8673ea67c4e467. However, it is not clear to > > me neither it is mentioned in comments why we have done it that way. > > Yes, I am confused why Sergey doesn't see that behavior.
I think this last new switched WAL with shutdown checkpoint record is incomplete and it does not marked as *.ready in pg_xlog/archive_status/ and not archived. -- Sergey Burladyan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
