*Updates till now:*

   - added a record to pg_proc (src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h)
   - modified opr_sanity regression check expected results
   - implemented a  low-level function called `array_contains_elem` as an
   equivalent to `array_contain_compare` but accepts anyelement instead of
   anyarray as the right operand. This is more efficient than constructing an
   array and then immediately deconstructing it.

*Questions:*

   - I'd like to check that anyelem and anyarray have the same element
   type. but anyelem is obtained from PG_FUNCTION_ARGS as a Datum. How can
   I make such a check?

Best Regards,
Mark Rofail
diff --git a/src/backend/access/gin/ginarrayproc.c b/src/backend/access/gin/ginarrayproc.c
index cc7435e030..214aac8fba 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/gin/ginarrayproc.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/gin/ginarrayproc.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #define GinContainsStrategy		2
 #define GinContainedStrategy	3
 #define GinEqualStrategy		4
+#define GinContainsElemStrategy		5
 
 
 /*
@@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ ginarrayextract(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	bool	   *nulls;
 	int			nelems;
 
-	get_typlenbyvalalign(ARR_ELEMTYPE(array),
+	get_typlenbyvalalign(ARR_ELEMTYPE(array),	
 						 &elmlen, &elmbyval, &elmalign);
 
 	deconstruct_array(array,
@@ -110,7 +111,8 @@ ginqueryarrayextract(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 		case GinOverlapStrategy:
 			*searchMode = GIN_SEARCH_MODE_DEFAULT;
 			break;
-		case GinContainsStrategy:
+			case GinContainsElemStrategy:
+			case GinContainsStrategy:
 			if (nelems > 0)
 				*searchMode = GIN_SEARCH_MODE_DEFAULT;
 			else	/* everything contains the empty set */
@@ -171,6 +173,7 @@ ginarrayconsistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				}
 			}
 			break;
+		case GinContainsElemStrategy:
 		case GinContainsStrategy:
 			/* result is not lossy */
 			*recheck = false;
@@ -258,7 +261,8 @@ ginarraytriconsistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 				}
 			}
 			break;
-		case GinContainsStrategy:
+			case GinContainsElemStrategy:
+			case GinContainsStrategy:
 			/* must have all elements in check[] true, and no nulls */
 			res = GIN_TRUE;
 			for (i = 0; i < nkeys; i++)
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c
index d9c8aa569c..8009ab5acb 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c
@@ -4232,6 +4232,107 @@ arraycontained(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
 }
 
+/*
+ * array_contains_elem : checks an array for a spefific element
+ */
+static bool
+array_contains_elem(AnyArrayType *array, Datum elem, Oid collation,
+					void **fn_extra)
+{
+	Oid 		element_type = AARR_ELEMTYPE(array);
+	TypeCacheEntry *typentry;
+	int 		nelems;
+	int			typlen;
+	bool		typbyval;
+	char		typalign;
+	int			i;
+	array_iter 	it1;
+	FunctionCallInfoData locfcinfo;
+
+	/*
+	 * We arrange to look up the equality function only once per series of
+	 * calls, assuming the element type doesn't change underneath us.  The
+	 * typcache is used so that we have no memory leakage when being used as
+	 * an index support function.
+	 */
+	typentry = (TypeCacheEntry *)*fn_extra;
+	if (typentry == NULL ||
+		typentry->type_id != element_type)
+	{
+		typentry = lookup_type_cache(element_type,
+									 TYPECACHE_EQ_OPR_FINFO);
+		if (!OidIsValid(typentry->eq_opr_finfo.fn_oid))
+			ereport(ERROR,
+					(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION),
+					 errmsg("could not identify an equality operator for type %s",
+							format_type_be(element_type))));
+		*fn_extra = (void *)typentry;
+	}
+	typlen = typentry->typlen;
+	typbyval = typentry->typbyval;
+	typalign = typentry->typalign;
+
+	/*
+	 * Apply the comparison operator to each pair of array elements.
+	 */
+	InitFunctionCallInfoData(locfcinfo, &typentry->eq_opr_finfo, 2,
+							 collation, NULL, NULL);
+
+	/* Loop over source data */
+	nelems = ArrayGetNItems(AARR_NDIM(array), AARR_DIMS(array));
+	array_iter_setup(&it1, array);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nelems; i++)
+	{
+		Datum elt1;
+		bool isnull;
+		bool oprresult;
+
+		/* Get element, checking for NULL */
+		elt1 = array_iter_next(&it1, &isnull, i, typlen, typbyval, typalign);
+
+		/*
+		 * We assume that the comparison operator is strict, so a NULL can't
+		 * match anything.  XXX this diverges from the "NULL=NULL" behavior of
+		 * array_eq, should we act like that?
+		 */
+		if (isnull)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+			* Apply the operator to the element pair
+			*/
+		locfcinfo.arg[0] = elt1;
+		locfcinfo.arg[1] = elem;
+		locfcinfo.argnull[0] = false;
+		locfcinfo.argnull[1] = false;
+		locfcinfo.isnull = false;
+		oprresult = DatumGetBool(FunctionCallInvoke(&locfcinfo));
+		if (oprresult)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+Datum
+arraycontainselem(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
+{
+	AnyArrayType *array = PG_GETARG_ANY_ARRAY(0);
+	Datum elem = PG_GETARG_DATUM(1);
+	Oid collation = PG_GET_COLLATION();
+	bool result;
+
+	result = array_contains_elem(array, elem, collation,
+								 &fcinfo->flinfo->fn_extra);
+
+	/* Avoid leaking memory when handed toasted input. */
+	AARR_FREE_IF_COPY(array, 0);
+	PG_FREE_IF_COPY( &elem, 1);
+
+	PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
+}
+
 
 /*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  * Array iteration functions
diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_amop.h b/src/include/catalog/pg_amop.h
index da0228de6b..4967a388e8 100644
--- a/src/include/catalog/pg_amop.h
+++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_amop.h
@@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ DATA(insert (	2745   2277 2277 1 s 2750 2742 0 ));
 DATA(insert (	2745   2277 2277 2 s 2751 2742 0 ));
 DATA(insert (	2745   2277 2277 3 s 2752 2742 0 ));
 DATA(insert (	2745   2277 2277 4 s 1070 2742 0 ));
+DATA(insert (	2745   2277 2283 5 s 6108 2742 0 ));
 
 /*
  * btree enum_ops
diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_operator.h b/src/include/catalog/pg_operator.h
index ccbb17efec..cc56d61bfb 100644
--- a/src/include/catalog/pg_operator.h
+++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_operator.h
@@ -1570,6 +1570,8 @@ DESCR("contains");
 DATA(insert OID = 2752 (  "<@"	   PGNSP PGUID b f f 2277 2277	16 2751  0 arraycontained arraycontsel arraycontjoinsel ));
 DESCR("is contained by");
 #define OID_ARRAY_CONTAINED_OP	2752
+DATA(insert OID = 6108 (  "@>"	   PGNSP PGUID b f f 2277 2283	16 0  0 arraycontainselem arraycontsel arraycontjoinsel ));
+DESCR("containselem");
 
 /* capturing operators to preserve pre-8.3 behavior of text concatenation */
 DATA(insert OID = 2779 (  "||"	   PGNSP PGUID b f f 25 2776	25	 0 0 textanycat - - ));
diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h
index 6c44def6e6..66ba68e9ef 100644
--- a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h
+++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h
@@ -4308,6 +4308,7 @@ DESCR("GIN array support (obsolete)");
 DATA(insert OID = 2747 (  arrayoverlap		   PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s 2 0 16 "2277 2277" _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ arrayoverlap _null_ _null_ _null_ ));
 DATA(insert OID = 2748 (  arraycontains		   PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s 2 0 16 "2277 2277" _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ arraycontains _null_ _null_ _null_ ));
 DATA(insert OID = 2749 (  arraycontained	   PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s 2 0 16 "2277 2277" _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ arraycontained _null_ _null_ _null_ ));
+DATA(insert OID = 6109 (  arraycontainselem		PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s 2 0 16 "2277 2283" _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ arraycontainselem _null_ _null_ _null_ ));
 
 /* BRIN minmax */
 DATA(insert OID = 3383 ( brin_minmax_opcinfo	PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s 1 0 2281 "2281" _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ _null_ brin_minmax_opcinfo _null_ _null_ _null_ ));
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/opr_sanity.out b/src/test/regress/expected/opr_sanity.out
index 1d7629f84e..dc98a8c8f9 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/opr_sanity.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/opr_sanity.out
@@ -1801,6 +1801,7 @@ ORDER BY 1, 2, 3;
        2742 |            2 | @@@
        2742 |            3 | <@
        2742 |            4 | =
+       2742 |            5 | @>
        2742 |            7 | @>
        2742 |            9 | ?
        2742 |           10 | ?|
@@ -1868,7 +1869,7 @@ ORDER BY 1, 2, 3;
        4000 |           25 | <<=
        4000 |           26 | >>
        4000 |           27 | >>=
-(121 rows)
+(122 rows)
 
 -- Check that all opclass search operators have selectivity estimators.
 -- This is not absolutely required, but it seems a reasonable thing
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to