On 2017/07/11 10:34, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
>> Also, there seems to be at least some preference
>> for excluding partitions by default from the \d listing.
>
> As another user of partitions I'll chime in and say that would be very
> nice! On the other hand, with pre-10 partitions you do see all the
> child tables with `\d`, so showing declarative partitions seems more
> consistent with the old functionality.
That's one way of looking at it. :)
> On the third hand with pre-10 partitions I can put the child tables
> into a separate schema to de-clutter `\d`, but I don't see any way to
> do that with declarative partitions. Since there is no workaround it
> makes it a bit more important for partitions not to be so noisy.
You can do that with declarative partitions:
create table foo (a int) partition by list (a);
create schema foo_parts;
create table foo_parts.foo1 partition of foo for values in (1);
create table foo_parts.foo2 partition of foo for values in (2);
\d
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner
--------+------+-------+-------
public | foo | table | amit
(1 row)
set search_path to foo_parts;
\d
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner
-----------+------+-------+-------
foo_parts | foo1 | table | amit
foo_parts | foo2 | table | amit
(2 rows)
Thanks,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
