On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > I posted a patch upthread which makes \d hide partitions (relispartition = > true relations) and include them if the newly proposed '!' modifier is > specified. The '+' modifier is being used to show additional detail of > relations chosen to be listed at all, so it seemed like a bad idea to > extend its meaning to also dictate whether partitions are to be listed.
+1. That'd be a mess. > Actually, if \d had shown RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE tables as of Type > "partitioned table", we wouldn't need a separate flag for marking a table > as having partitions. I think that is false. Whether something is partitioned and whether it is a partition are independent concerns. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
