Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > Objections to committing this now, instead of waiting for v11? > > But I am -1 for the sneak part. It is not the time to have a new > feature in 10, the focus is to stabilize. But if we were treating it as a security issue, would we backpatch it? If we do, then it definitely makes sense to put something in pg10. I'm not sure that this patch is it, though -- perhaps it makes sense to put a minimal fix in older branches, and let the new feature wait for pg11? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
