Le 24/07/2017 à 21:18, Tom Lane a écrit : > Gilles Darold <gilles.dar...@dalibo.com> writes: >> Le 24/07/2017 à 19:19, Tom Lane a écrit : >>> ... I'm inclined to think in terms of fixing it at that level >>> rather than in pg_dump. It doesn't look like it would be hard to fix: >>> both functions ultimately call get_query_def(), it's just that one passes >>> down a tuple descriptor for the view while the other currently doesn't. >> I was thinking that this was intentional that pg_get_ruledef() returns >> the raw code typed by the user. I will fix it and send a patch following >> your explanation. > Oh, I just committed a patch.
That's fine, I'm sure it is better than the one I could produce :-) Thanks for fixing this issue. -- Gilles Darold Consultant PostgreSQL http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
