On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > I mean constraints derived from WITH CHECK OPTIONs specified for parent > views. We use the words "WITH CHECK OPTION constraints" in comments in > nodeModifyTable.c, so the expression "CHECK OPTION constrains" doesn't sound > not that bad to me. (I used "CHECK OPTION", not "WITH CHECK OPTION", > because we use "CHECK OPTION" a lot more in the documentation than "WITH > CHECK OPTION".)
Yeah, it seems OK to me, too; if the consensus is otherwise, we also have the option to change it later. Committed and back-patched as you had it, but I removed a spurious comma. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
