Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 20:29 Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
>> I should point out that this commit was made during the 9.6 cycle, and
>> I get the same issue with 9.6.
> Interesting that Tom didn't. Still, that does make more sense to me.
Yeah, it makes more sense to me too, but nonetheless that's the result
I get. I suspect there is an element of indeterminacy here.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
