On 10 August 2017 at 23:25, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
> > I think so - specifically, that it's a leftover from a revision where the
> > xid limit was advanced before clog truncation.
> >
> > I'll be finding time in the next couple of days to look more closely and
> > ensure that's all it is.
> A couple of days having gone by without hearing further on this, I'm
> going to assume for the moment that my analysis is correct and just
> push a commit to remove this assertion.  That's not intended to
> discourage you from spending further time on this - it would be bad to
> be wrong about this - but doing something we all agree is wrong can't
> be better than doing something that I, at least, think is correct.


Keeps getting bumped down by other things, but it's on the stack to not get

 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to