On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I think so - specifically, that it's a leftover from a revision where the > xid limit was advanced before clog truncation. > > I'll be finding time in the next couple of days to look more closely and > ensure that's all it is.
A couple of days having gone by without hearing further on this, I'm going to assume for the moment that my analysis is correct and just push a commit to remove this assertion. That's not intended to discourage you from spending further time on this - it would be bad to be wrong about this - but doing something we all agree is wrong can't be better than doing something that I, at least, think is correct. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
