On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently vacuum verbose outputs vacuum logs as follows. The first log > message INFO: vacuuming "public.hoge" writes the relation name with > schema name but subsequent vacuum logs output only relation name > without schema name. I've encountered a situation where there are some > same name tables in different schemas and the concurrent vacuum logs > made me hard to distinguish tables. Is there any reasons why we don't > write an explicit name in vacuum verbose logs? If not, can we add > schema names to be more clearly?
That's definitely a good idea. lazy_vacuum_rel() uses in one place dbname.schname.relname for autovacuum. This is an inconsistent bit, but that's not really worth changing and there is always log_line_prefix = '%d'. In vacuum_rel()@vacuum.c, there are a couple of logs that could be improved as well with the schema name. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers