Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Michael Paquier wrote: >> Hm. I am not sure what you have in mind here.
> I'm thinking that this data is useful to analyze as a stream of related > events, rather than as individual data points. Grepping logs in order to > extract the numbers is lame and slow. Yes. And there is a bigger issue here, which is that the output of VACUUM VERBOSE is meant to be sent to the client for *human* readability. (As you noted, INFO-level messages don't normally go to the server log in the first place, and that's not by accident.) Repeating the full table name in every line will be really annoying for that primary use-case. I am not sure what we want to do to address Masahiko-san's use-case, but ideally his workflow wouldn't involve log-scraping at all. It definitely shouldn't involve depending on INFO messages --- for one thing, what happens when those get translated? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers