On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/08/17 11:22, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Amit Langote >> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>>> In the catalogs we are using full "partitioned" e.g. pg_partitioned_table. >>>> May >>>> be we should name the column as "inhchildpartitioned". >>> >>> Sure. >> >> I suggest inhpartitioned or inhispartition. inhchildpartitioned seems too >> long. > > inhchildpartitioned indeed seems long. > > Since we storing if the child table (one with the OID inhrelid) is > partitioned, inhpartitioned seems best to me. Will implement that.
inhchildpartitioned is long but clearly tells that the child table is partitioned, not the parent. pg_inherit can have parents which are not partitioned, so it's better to have self-explanatory catalog name. I am fine with some other name as long as it's clear. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers