On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Attached is a quick sketch of how this could perhaps be done (ignoring
> > for the moment the relatively-boring opclass pushups).
> Here it is with some relatively-boring opclass pushups added.  I just
> did the int4 bit; the same thing will need to be done, uh, 35 more
> times.  But you get the gist.  No, not that kind of gist.
> ‚Äč
I will work on this.

I have a small query,  what if I want a cache entry with extended hash
function instead standard one, I might require that while adding
hash_array_extended function? Do you think we need to extend
lookup_type_cache() as well?


Reply via email to