On 8/17/17 23:13, Noah Misch wrote: >> I haven't read anything since that has provided any more clarity about >> what needs changing here. I will entertain concrete proposals about the >> specific points above (considering any other issues under discussion to >> be PG11 material), but in the absence of that, I don't plan any work on >> this right now. > I think you're contending that, as formulated, this is not a valid v10 open > item. Are you?
Well, some people are not content with the current state of things, so it is probably an open item. I will propose patches on Monday to hopefully close this. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
