On 8/17/17 23:13, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I haven't read anything since that has provided any more clarity about
>> what needs changing here.  I will entertain concrete proposals about the
>> specific points above (considering any other issues under discussion to
>> be PG11 material), but in the absence of that, I don't plan any work on
>> this right now.
> I think you're contending that, as formulated, this is not a valid v10 open
> item.  Are you?

Well, some people are not content with the current state of things, so
it is probably an open item.  I will propose patches on Monday to
hopefully close this.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to