On 8/25/17 04:00, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-24 
> <8aa00f15-144e-e793-750e-d1d6876d6...@2ndquadrant.com>
>> On 8/23/17 09:36, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I think I agree.  It seems to me that the version of pg_upgrade
>>> shipped with release N only needs to support upgrades to release N,
>>> not older releases.  There's probably room for debate about whether a
>>> pg_upgrade needs to support direct upgrades FROM very old releases,
>>> but we need not decide anything about that right now.
>>>
>>> I think you could go ahead and rip out this code, but as it seems like
>>> a non-critical change, -1 for back-patching it.
>>
>> committed to PG10 and master
> 
> This #define seems to be obsolete now as well:
> src/bin/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.h:#define TABLE_SPACE_SUBDIRS_CAT_VER 201001111

fixed, thanks

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to