Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/4/17 06:03, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Michael Paquier <> writes:
> >>> I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing
> >>> flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now
> >>> in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug
> >>> messages should be translated. So what about the attached?
> >>
> >> Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf
> >> is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is.  I've not reviewed
> >> this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it.
> > 
> > Actually this code goes throgh vsnprintf, not fprintf, which should be
> > safe, so I removed that part of the comment, and pushed.
> Is there a reason this was not backpatched to 9.5?


Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to