On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > So I think this is just an excuse for turning --no-security-labels > into --no-object-property=security-label. To me, that's just plain > worse.
It does not seem that my thoughts here have been correctly transmitted to your brain. I do not mean to change the user-facing options, just to refactor the code internally so as --no-foo switches can be more easily generated, added and handled as they are associated with an object type. A portion of the complains is caused by the fact that a lot of similar code is duplicated. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers