On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: >> Can we expect a rebased version of this patch for this commitfest? Since >> it’s >> a rather large feature it would be good to get it in as early as we can in >> the >> process. > > Again, given that this needs a "major" rebase and hasn't been updated > in a month, and given that the CF is already half over, this should > just be bumped to the next CF. We're supposed to be trying to review > things that were ready to go by the start of the CF, not the end.
We are supporting v10 branch in our github repository https://github.com/postgrespro/sqljson/tree/sqljson_v10 Since the first post we made a lot of changes, mostly because of better understanding the standard and availability of technical report (http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c067367_ISO_IEC_TR_19075-6_2017.zip). Most important are: 1.We abandoned FORMAT support, which could confuse our users, since we have data types json[b]. 2. We use XMLTABLE infrastructure, extended for JSON_TABLE support. 3. Reorganize commits, so we could split one big patch by several smaller patches, which could be reviewed independently. 4. The biggest problem is documentation, we are working on it. Nikita will submit patches soon. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers