On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd think about adjusting the comments the proper way for each AM so
> as one can read those comments and catch any limitation immediately.
> The fact this has not been pointed out on this thread before any
> checks and the many mails exchanged on the matter on this thread make
> me think that the current code does not outline the current code
> properties appropriately.

Another thing that we could consider as well is adding an assertion in
XLogRegisterBuffer & friends so as the combination of REGBUF_STANDARD
and REGBUF_NO_IMAGE is forbidden. That's bugging me as well.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to