On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd think about adjusting the comments the proper way for each AM so >> as one can read those comments and catch any limitation immediately. >> The fact this has not been pointed out on this thread before any >> checks and the many mails exchanged on the matter on this thread make >> me think that the current code does not outline the current code >> properties appropriately. > > Another thing that we could consider as well is adding an assertion in > XLogRegisterBuffer & friends so as the combination of REGBUF_STANDARD > and REGBUF_NO_IMAGE is forbidden. That's bugging me as well. >
Is that related to this patch? If not, then maybe we can discuss it in a separate thread. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
