Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I've marked the CF entry closed. However, I'm not sure if we're quite >>> done with this thread. Weren't we going to adjust nbtree and hash to >>> be more aggressive about labeling their metapages as REGBUF_STANDARD?
>> I have already posted the patches  for the same in this thread and >> those are reviewed  as well. I have adjusted the comments as per >> latest commit. Please find updated patches attached. > Confirmed. Setting those makes sense even if REGBUF_WILL_INIT is set, > at least for page masking. Thanks, I'd forgotten those patches were already posted. Looks good, so pushed. Looking around, I noted that contrib/bloom also had the disease of not telling log_newpage it was writing a standard-format metapage, so I fixed that too. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers