On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> I have spent some time looking at your patch and testing it. This >> looks sane. A small comment that I have would be to add an assertion >> at the top of perform_work_item to be sure that it is called in the >> memory context of AutovacMemCxt. > > Done like that, thanks for reviewing!
Thanks for considering my idea. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
