I wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> OK, that seems to be the consensus. So let's apply the blacklist patch
>> and then separately remove the 'created in the same transaction' test.
>> We'll need to adjust the regression tests and docs accordingly.
> Agreed. I'll work on that in a little bit.
Pushed; sorry for the delay.
I noticed that the blacklist mechanism effectively removed the prohibition
against using a renamed enum value later in the same transaction, so I
added a regression test for that. Also, as committed, I used RENAME TYPE
rather than ALTER OWNER in the test cases requiring an updated pg_type
row. That way we don't need to create a role, even a transient one, which
is a good thing in terms of not risking collisions with other sessions.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
