Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:07:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Any other votes out there?
> Well, I was concerned yesterday that we had a broken build farm so close
> to release. (I got consistent regression failures.) I think PG 11 would
> be better for this feature change, so I support reverting this.
I'll take the blame for (most of) yesterday's failures in the v10
branch, but they were unrelated to this patch --- they were because
of that SIGBUS patch I messed up. So that doesn't seem like a very
applicable argument. Still, it's true that this seems like the most
consequential patch that's gone into v10 post-RC1, certainly so if
you discount stuff that was back-patched further than v10.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
