On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > > Well these kinds of monitoring systems tend to be used by operations > > people who are a lot more practical and a lot less worried about > > theoretical concerns like that. > > +1, well said. > +1 as well. I think these people would be perfectly find by it changing across a version upgrade as long as they know that's the deal. *Most* of the time there is no version upgrade going on, so it would work fine that time. Most operations people already deal with a lot of such parameters changing around. I'm sure most of them would be more than happy with an improvement, even if it's not mathematically perfect. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
