On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2017-10-03 03:07:09 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> +1, >> I see 3 options there: >> 1) Drop high-order bit, as you proposed. >> 2) Allow negative queryIds. >> 3) Implement unsigned 64-type. > > 4) use numeric, efficiency when querying is not a significant concern here > 5) use a custom type that doesn't support arithmetic, similar to pg_lsn.
Why not just returning a hexa-like text? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers