Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-10-02 17:30:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Or replace the spinlock with an LWLock?
> That'd probably be a good idea, but I'm loathe to do so in the back > branches. Not at this callsite, but some others, there's some potential > for contention. If this is the only problem then I'd agree we should stick to a spinlock (I assume the strings in question can't be very long). I was thinking more about what to do if we find other violations that are harder to fix. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers