On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's possible that we might find that neither of the above approaches > are practical and that the performance benefits of resolving the > transaction from the original connection are large enough that we want > to try to make it work anyhow. However, I think we can postpone that > work to a future time. Any general solution to this problem at least > needs to be ABLE to resolve transactions at a later time from a > different session, so let's get that working first, and then see what > else we want to do. >
+1. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
