On October 5, 2017 5:15:41 PM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2017-10-06 07:59:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >>> The only thing that gets me excited about a threaded postgres is the >>> ability to have a PL/Java, PL/Mono etc that don't suck. We could do >>> some really cool things that just aren't practical right now. > >> Faster parallelism with a lot less reinventing the wheel. Easier >backend >> / session separation. Shared caches. > >What you guys are talking about here is a threaded backend, which is a >whole different matter from replacing the client-side threading that >Nico >was looking at. That would surely offer far higher rewards, but the >costs >to get there are likewise orders of magnitude greater.
No disagreement there. Don't really see much need for it client side though. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers