On October 5, 2017 5:15:41 PM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2017-10-06 07:59:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> The only thing that gets me excited about a threaded postgres is the
>>> ability to have a PL/Java, PL/Mono etc that don't suck. We could do
>>> some really cool things that just aren't practical right now.
>> Faster parallelism with a lot less reinventing the wheel. Easier
>> / session separation. Shared caches.
>What you guys are talking about here is a threaded backend, which is a
>whole different matter from replacing the client-side threading that
>was looking at.  That would surely offer far higher rewards, but the
>to get there are likewise orders of magnitude greater.

No disagreement there. Don't really see much need for it client side though.

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to