> On Oct 22, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Eric Ridge <eeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm or deny that this is correct?  I feel like it is correct, 
>> but I'm no expert.
> What are you going to use the code for? I think that that context is
> likely to matter here.

I'm not exactly sure yet, but I'm thinking about storing transaction ids 
externally and then regularly poking Postgres to see which ones are 
aborted-and-no-longer-considered-visible so I can clean up my external list.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to