> On Oct 22, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Eric Ridge <eeb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Can anyone confirm or deny that this is correct? I feel like it is correct, >> but I'm no expert. > > What are you going to use the code for? I think that that context is > likely to matter here.
I'm not exactly sure yet, but I'm thinking about storing transaction ids externally and then regularly poking Postgres to see which ones are aborted-and-no-longer-considered-visible so I can clean up my external list. eric -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
