On 23 October 2017 at 05:44, Eric Ridge <eeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 22, 2017, at 3:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:

>> Again, you'll probably need to put this low level requirement into
>> context if you want sound advice from this list.
> I'm just thinking out lout here, but the context is likely something along 
> the lines of externally storing all transaction ids, and periodically asking 
> Postgres if they're known-to-be-aborted-by-all-transactions -- one at a time.

I think Peter is asking "why?".

 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to