Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 10/26/17 16:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In view of commit 1ff01b390, aren't we more or less locked into
>> lower-case anchors going forward?
> The details are more complicated. ...
Ah. I'd imagined that we were using the original case for the anchors,
rather than smashing them to upper (or lower) case.
> So the options are simply
> 1) Use the patch and keep indefinitely, keeping anchors compatible back
> to forever and forward indefinitely.
> 2) Don't use the patch, breaking anchors from <=9.6, but keeping them
> compatible going forward.
>
> Considering how small the patch is compared to some other customizations
> we carry, #1 seems reasonable to me.
+1
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
