On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > ... but I'm not sure that it's an improvement in cases where you have to > cast away the const somewhere else.
I agree. I guess I may be in the minority here but I don't really like decorating things with const too much because I have tended to find that once you start adding const, you end up having to add it in more and more places to avoid warnings, and then eventually that causes you to have to start casting it away. Perhaps I was just Doing It Wrong. Anyway, I don't see much point in having const if you're just going to have to cast it to non-const. Then it wasn't really very const in the first place... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers