On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Jacob Champion <pchamp...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It seems to me that 0001 is good for a committer lookup, that will get
>> rid of all existing bugs. For 0002, what you are proposing is still
>> not a good idea for anything using page copies.
> I think there is still significant confusion here. To be clear: this
> patch is intended to add no changes for local page copies.

Maybe a better way to put this is: we see no failures with the
pageinspect regression tests, which exercise PageGetLSN() via the
page_header() function. Are there other tests we should be paying
attention to that might show a problem with our local-copy logic?


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to