On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I did miss the need to fix the docs, and am happy to put in some strong
> wording about the security hazards of these functions while fixing the
> docs.  But I do not think that leaving them with hardwired superuser
> checks is an improvement over being able to control them with GRANT.

Sorry about that. lobj.sgml indeed mentions superusers. Do you need a patch?

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to