Stephan Szabo writes:

> It's a constraint name.  IIRC, it happens to affect all such named
> constraints currently. We should probably allow <tablename>.<constraint>
> (and <schema>.<tablename>.<constraint>) as well. Too late for 7.4, but
> this can happen for 7.5 if there aren't any objections.

I object.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to