Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: > > > It's a constraint name. IIRC, it happens to affect all such named > > > constraints currently. We should probably allow <tablename>.<constraint> > > > (and <schema>.<tablename>.<constraint>) as well. Too late for 7.4, but > > > this can happen for 7.5 if there aren't any objections. > > > > I object. > > Thanks for the helpful objection. To what do you object specifically and > why?
I object to creating gratuitous incompatibilities with the SQL standard, which will obstruct legitimate features down the road. The SQL standard says it is <schema>.<constraint>. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
