On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Based on the below wouldn't they also have to go after Microsoft?
Depends ... does MicroSoft use BSD TCP/IP, or did they write their own? I know that Linux is not using BSD TCP/IP (or, at least, they didn't in their first 3 incarnations of the stack) ... > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > >On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > > > > >><troll>Of course, now that SCO is claiming ownership of BSD code ..... > >></troll> > >> > >> > > > >Interesting thread that ... last I read on the FreeBSD lists was > >speculation that they would be going after ppl like Cisco (re: TCP/IP > >Networking Code) since there really is nobody else large enough to bother > >with ... its going to be interesting to see :) > > > >---- > >Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > > > > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > >TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > > joining column's datatypes do not match > > > > > > -- > Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC > Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. > +1-503-222-2783 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com > Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org > > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
